The progressive blogosphere is all a twitter about the government's latest move to keep political advisors away from parliamentary committees. Me? I just have to ask, what did the opposition think was going to happen, after they "compromised" on parliamentary supremacy? Harper is doing what any good bully does, he senses weakness and he is exploiting it. If the opposition had the balls to say no to Harper and stick to it, he would back down, or, even better, we would have an election. As long as the opposition keep dropping their pants and bending over, Harper will continue to rape them with a beer bottle.
Update: I suspect the Speaker will again rule that the parliament is supreme (lol), but beg for a compromise and throw it back into the laps of the hapless opposition, who will then limbo their way to the PMO's way of looking at things.
Recommend this Post
If the opposition had the balls to say no to Harper and stick to it, he would back down, or, even better, we would have an election.
ReplyDeleteYep.
Mind you, he isn't raping them with a beer bottle. He's just running the country as he sees fit -- and they're letting him.
For supporters of the other parties, that's got to sting.
You are right, it is consensual. It still involves a beer bottle though.
ReplyDeleteYes, but that's more when the opposition MPs head to their local and place their orders and say, "I can't believe we're letting him get away with it" -- and when the gov't MPs go to theirs and place their orders and say, "Wow, we got away with THAT? I mean, at this point, we could say we're sending the constitution back to London and the Liberals would sign off on it."
ReplyDelete"Mind you, he isn't raping them with a beer bottle. . . ."
ReplyDeleteAre you Kory Teneycke?
My cover's been blown!
ReplyDelete*runs to the exit*
I wish it was just the Liberals.
ReplyDelete