One rough division of labour here at Maclean’s has long held that Colleague Coyne advocated for electoral reform, whereas I didn’t care. Those days are over. Part of the recent crisis was due to the way our electoral system affords the Bloc Quebecois far more space than the other parties are willing to afford it legitimacy. If we don’t think a separatist party has as much right as the others to determine who keeps or loses power, then it makes no sense to hang onto an electoral system whose many insanities include its tendency to give the Bloc more seats than its share of votes. I will be looking for a mainstream party that credibly and seriously advocates major electoral reform, to bring our Parliament more closely into alignment with the voters’ wishes.Despite the mess we are in politically, I count this as a good day. Recommend this Post
My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world. Jack Layton
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Like Paul On The Road To Damascus?
Wells has seen the light:
Labels:
Electoral Reform
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Woot! *fistpump*
ReplyDeleteIf we don’t think a separatist party has as much right as the others to determine who keeps or loses power
ReplyDeleteJackass comment. You get that right by being elected without cheating. Now we're going to start telling people that if they believe the wrong things, they weren't really elected? Screw that.
I agreed with Wells in a fit of rage against the separatists for approximately three hours...
ReplyDeleteIt's a good argument for reform, I'll say that.
I am just glad he is now on side.
ReplyDeleteSo, Greg, did you get my invite to write for the WWBA?
ReplyDeleteHi James, no I didn't. If it is at Facebook, I haven't been on in days. I will go check.
ReplyDeleteFound it. Sent my reply. :)
ReplyDelete